If you watched Kerry's speech with the Innocents Abroad checklist (stolen, of course, from William Kristol and William Safire), you were sorely disappointed. The speech was rather short on substance. As far as trying to prove their patriotism, the Democrats showed that they have to play by the terms set by the Republicans. It's possible that Kerry will win, but it seems to be less and less likely with each passing day. The speech certainly didn't help him. It's hard to imagine why Hugh Hewitt rates such insincere hawkishness a "solid single." Even David Brooks thought the speech was good initially before coming to his senses. Perhaps more conservative pundits were initially flattered by Kerry's professed patriotism.
Monday, August 02, 2004
Best
Euro-Blog, 2003
- National Review Online
Commentariat
RealClearPolitics
Weekly Standard
National Review
Commentary
The American Interest
National Interest
New Criterion
First Things
The New Atlantis
Foreign Affairs
The American Enterprise
Policy Review
OpinionJournal-WSJ
City Journal
Hoover Digest
Jewish World Review
American Spectator
The New Republic
New York Observer
Public Interest
Mark Steyn
Daniel Pipes
News
Washington Post
Wall Street Journal
Christian Science Monitor
New York Times
Washington Times
Financial Times
Int'l Herald Tribune
Jerusalem Post
Israel Insider
New York Sun
Le Figaro
Drudge Report
Blogs
It shines for all
Barone Blog
EURSOC
The American Scene
The Belmont Club
Chicago Boyz
Galley Slaves
OxBlog
Armavirumque
Josh Marshall
Daniel Drezner
Instapundit
American Future
Lileks
Belgravia Dispatch
ArtsJournal
Polysigh
Power Line
Little Green Footballs
The Reform Club
Kudlow
Geopolitics/Defense
PNAC
DefenseLink
Jane's Defense Weekly
Global Security
Strategy Page
DefenseTech
Debka File
Center for Security Policy
Economics/Finance
Poor and Stupid
Institutional Economics
The Capital Spectator
The Knowledge Problem
Economic Principals
Buffett's Shareholder Letters
The Case for Indexing
Efficient Frontier
WershovenistPig
Misc.
Hudson Institute
Claremont Institute
Federalist Society
Arts & Letters Daily
Federation of American Scientists
- National Review Online
Contributors
RealClearPolitics
Weekly Standard
National Review
Commentary
The American Interest
National Interest
New Criterion
First Things
The New Atlantis
Foreign Affairs
The American Enterprise
Policy Review
OpinionJournal-WSJ
City Journal
Hoover Digest
Jewish World Review
American Spectator
The New Republic
New York Observer
Public Interest
Mark Steyn
Daniel Pipes
News
Washington Post
Wall Street Journal
Christian Science Monitor
New York Times
Washington Times
Financial Times
Int'l Herald Tribune
Jerusalem Post
Israel Insider
New York Sun
Le Figaro
Drudge Report
Blogs
It shines for all
Barone Blog
EURSOC
The American Scene
The Belmont Club
Chicago Boyz
Galley Slaves
OxBlog
Armavirumque
Josh Marshall
Daniel Drezner
Instapundit
American Future
Lileks
Belgravia Dispatch
ArtsJournal
Polysigh
Power Line
Little Green Footballs
The Reform Club
Kudlow
Geopolitics/Defense
PNAC
DefenseLink
Jane's Defense Weekly
Global Security
Strategy Page
DefenseTech
Debka File
Center for Security Policy
Economics/Finance
Poor and Stupid
Institutional Economics
The Capital Spectator
The Knowledge Problem
Economic Principals
Buffett's Shareholder Letters
The Case for Indexing
Efficient Frontier
WershovenistPig
Misc.
Hudson Institute
Claremont Institute
Federalist Society
Arts & Letters Daily
Federation of American Scientists
Previous Posts
- Mental Checklist for Tonight Keep this William S...
- My last post notwithstanding, so we learned (or re...
- The Convention of the Blog? Some bloggers are th...
- Foreign Policy and Marriage William Kristol think...
- The Original Purpose of the V.P. Briefly taking u...
- Leave the kid alone.....
- The following piece is a special contribution to I...
- Dinesh D'Souza, Rousseauian? Conservative pundit,...
- Christianity, Progressivism, and Foreign Policy P...
- Kerry's Foreign Policy Emerges The following two ...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home